Skip to content

Considering the Evolutionary Point of View: Why It’s Entirely Rational for Older Men to Date Younger Women

People often wonder: “Why do older men like younger women?” From the lay public to the psychologists, it’s an enduring question. The other day I stumbled upon an article over at the Huffington Post about younger women dating older men. The author gives the usual statistics regarding older men dating and marring younger women. Towards the end she quotes Lynn Philips, a psychologist and professor of Communication at the University of Massachusetts:

Philips argued that individual needy girls and exploitative men are not the only factors driving these relationships. “From music videos, to porn, to Disney, this all sits within this bigger cultural context of media images and cultural messages that absolutely eroticize and hyper-sexualize teen girls,” she said. “As much as we say we’re appalled by [these relationships] and concerned by them, there are things out there in the culture that make this happen.”

Philip points to American culture where TV and movie screens as well as online and print publications feature scores of young beautiful women to explain why older men go after younger women. This doesn’t seem totally unreasonable – beautiful women do dominate our visual and mental experiences throughout the day – and I’ve heard this argument before. This article, for example, argues that, “men’s sexual desire is driven by culture, not evolution.”

In his latest book Sex, Murder, and The Meaning of LIfe, Douglas Kenrick, whose research I mentioned a few posts ago, thinks otherwise. He believes that there is a “universal attraction between older men and younger women” to suggest that culture is actually the effect and not the cause. Here is an exert from a paper by Andrew Delton, Theresa Robertson and Douglas Kenrick done a few years back that summarizes this point with concrete data (I’ve included links to as many papers I could track down if anyone is interested).

Across 37 different cultures, Buss (1989) found that, on average, males preferred a mate who was about two and a half years younger. Buss also found that actual ages at marriage closely paralleled the stated male preference. Several studies by other evolutionary psychologists have suggested that this average discrepancy can be a bit misleading as a description of age preferences for people who are older than 30, or younger than 20 (Essock, 1989; Kenrick, Gabrielidis, Keefe, and Cornelius, 1996; Kenrick and Keefe, 1992; Otta, Queiroz, Campos, daSilva, Silveira, 1999; Wiederman and Allgeier, 1992). Using a variety of sources—singles ads and marriage statistics from cross-national and cross-generational samples—Kenrick and Keefe (1992) found that men in their 20s preferred or married women of roughly their own age, but as men aged they preferred or married women who were progressively younger than themselves. For instance, men in their 60s on the island of Poro (data were from the years 1913 to 1939) married women who were about 20 years younger. Although older men do prefer younger women, not all men seek out and/or marry women in their 20s. Kenrick and Keefe expected this based on a number of factors, including the countervailing preference for similarity, as well as the constraints of mutual choice (there is generally little to be gained by seeking a marital partner who is not likely to reciprocate your interest, and elderly men, regardless of their own preferences, may not be able to attract young attractive females).

To further test the hypothesis that men prefer fertility rather than relative youth per se, Kenrick and colleagues (1996) interviewed adolescent males about who they would find attractive as a dating partner. These adolescent males indicated that females older than themselves—women in their early 20s—would be maximally desirable, although they also expressed awareness that those women would not likely reciprocate their interest. For males at this age, it is relatively older women who are maximally fertile. Men thus do not seem to be following a cultural rule that dictates “mate with a younger woman.” Instead, based on these studies and others, evolutionary psychologists concluded that males prefer young women as mates because, at most points in a male’s life, relative youth is a cue to fertility. (italics mine)

The evidence is clear: biology explains why older men are attracted to young women – not culture norms.

Here’s what I find interesting. Kenrick argues that in light of our evolutionary motives many consumer purchases could be considered “deeply rational”. Take a $400,000 Porsche. This car is a waste of money by any metric. It has little cargo space, a poor safety record, there are only two seats, poor gas mileage, etc. However, some people (mostly old rich men) buy it. While most economists would label this as an example of “irrational behavior”, Kenrick thinks otherwise:

Besides the decision-making variations arising from a person’s sex and life history stage, our model suggests that each individual decision-maker has several different economic subselves, and that the subself in charge right now depends on which adaptive threats and opportunities are currently prominent in the environment. What looks like irrationality to one subself may be deeply rational to another. Your marketplace subself, which is dominated by the question: “What’s in it for moi?” would be aghast at the exorbitant bill your parental subself has run up sending junior through college, for example.

The logic of Deep Rationality suggests that fundamental biological motives such as mating and self protection should drastically change all the traditional behavioral economic biases, such as temporal discounting (the tendency to take a loss for an immediate payoff rather than wait for a larger one), and probability discounting (the tendency to prefer a certain payoff over a chance at a larger one). The same motives should also move around what a person regards as a luxury versus as a necessity, and should do so very differently for men and women. A series of experiments by Norm Li and his colleagues has already begun to demonstrate the profound importance of distinguishing between luxuries and necessities in different aspects of social decision-making.

In short, on the evolutionary level, it is rational to buy that Porsche because it is man’s natural way of advertising himself –  if he wants to ensue that his genes get passed on to the next generation, it doesn’t seem all that stupid. Now, does this mean it is wise or right for a man to spend hundreds of thousands on that new car? Not at all, the naturalistic fallacy reminds us that something is not necessarily right just because it is natural. But Kenrick’s point helps us better understand why he would. Moreover, he reminds us that “on the evolutionary view, what seems irrational at the surface level may be, on closer examination, deeply rational.” So heads up Adam Smith, your standards for rational behavior aren’t the only ones.

12 Comments Post a comment
  1. Kuze #

    Great article!

    What about from the female’s perspective, why get with older guys? Established, proven ability to provide? Wealth? Maybe in the violent world of our ancestors being “old” was an achievement in itself?

    October 3, 2011
    • sammcnerney #

      Thanks,

      Let’s see. I was thinking about mentioning a few of Kenrick’s studies that answer your question but the post was getting a little long. Essentially, he (along with a number of other psychologists) argue that women tend to go for older men because older men promise more wealth, power and protection. This, I think, is also “rational” evolutionarily speaking.

      There are some caveats though. For example, women seeking short term hook ups value men with more obvious signs of wealth (e.g., the Porsche) while women seeking long term relationships value character (e.g., trust, modesty). Kenrick’s book explicates these points well.

      October 3, 2011
    • beep boop #

      Female… perspective? I think you’ve entirely misunderstood this article.

      October 4, 2011
      • sammcnerney #

        I am aware of the female perspective, I just chose to focus on the male perspective.

        October 4, 2011
  2. Cougar and the Biebs!!! #

    Thankfully, women are becoming more and more powerful in their own right (http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/04/opinion/bennett-men-in-trouble/index.html?hpt=li_c2). They will not need the old men and their $400,000 porsche since they will be able to afford their own. These young gold digging women are a dime a dozen but will soon be phased out!

    October 5, 2011
    • sammcnerney #

      Give it a couple hundred years and the women will be wooing the men with Porches of their own!

      October 5, 2011
      • Cougar and the Biebs #

        Couple hundred years, no way, it is already happening! Mr. Mom’s are a growing breed, it is no longer just a Michael Keaton movie!

        October 5, 2011
        • sammcnerney #

          Scary. And I don’t feel bad for men, we’ve had our 100,000+ years as the dominant species.

          October 5, 2011
  3. You’re truly a just right webmaster. The website loading pace is amazing. It sort of feels that you’re doing any distinctive trick. Also, The contents are masterwork. you’ve done a wonderful task in this topic!

    June 4, 2012
  4. Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive learn something like this before. So good to search out someone with some original thoughts on this subject. realy thanks for starting this up. this website is one thing that’s wanted on the internet, somebody with a bit originality. useful job for bringing one thing new to the internet!

    February 11, 2013
  5. J. Stock #

    I am a widow and in my late 60’s. I have dated older and younger men. I prefer a guy 3 or 4 years younger than I. Those individuals over 60 are not as hung up on age as those under 60. Do you have any statistics on seniors and how they relate. Age is not a hang up for me, and does not seem to be for those I date. I would recommend no more than a 5 year differential each way, and I see many couples where the wife or girlfriend is 5 years older than the male. Women live longer than men.

    July 27, 2015
  6. Why also, do older women tend to go for younger men?.

    August 16, 2015

Leave a Reply, Be Constructive, and Let's Debate

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: